Wednesday, October 21, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

New York City Evening, 2019 by Stefan Bleekrode

New York City Evening, 2019 by Stefan Bleekrode (Netherlands, 1986 - )






























Click to enlarge.

Tuesday, October 20, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Haskell's House, 1924 by Edward Hopper

Haskell's House, 1924 by Edward Hopper (America, 1882-1967)




























Click to enlarge.

Monday, October 19, 2026

Exposure increases interclass marriage but has no detectable effect on interracial marriage

From Who Marries Whom? The Role of Segregation by Race and Class by Benjamin Goldman, Jamie Gracie, and Sonya R. Porter.  From the Abstract:

Americans rarely marry outside their race or class group, a pattern with well-documented implications for inequality and intergenerational mobility. Limited exposure may partly explain these low intergroup marriage rates. We instrument for exposure using variation in childhood neighborhoods based on whether other race and class groups had more opposite-sex children of similar age. Exposure increases interclass (high- and low-parent income) marriage but has no detectable effect on interracial (White and Black) marriage. A spatial marriage model predicts that residential segregation—one of many forms of exposure—accounts for more than one-third of marital sorting by class but less than 5 percent by race.

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

DataTalks

 

My Secret Fantasy by Pamela Hoffmeister

My Secret Fantasy by Pamela Hoffmeister (America, 1955 - )

































Click to enlarge.

Sunday, October 18, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Young Corn II, 1949 by Grant Wood

Young Corn II, 1949 by Grant Wood (America, 1891-1942)



















Click to enlarge.

Saturday, October 17, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Anna Maria, 2004 by Henning von Gierke

Anna Maria, 2004 by Henning von Gierke (Germany, 1947 - ) 































Click to enlarge.

Friday, October 16, 2026

How cognitive pollution is made at mass scale.

From SLEEPY TIME ☙ Friday, October 16, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 by Jeff Childers.  The subheading is Trump DOJ sues California three weeks before the election for refusing last-minute integrity request--what it’s all about; another high-profile covid mRNA vaccine study goes down in flames; more.

This week’s news cycle delivered another ‘peer-reviewed’ jab study that turned out to be faked. Don’t be shocked: the balloon of guilt once again exploded all over the lone doctoral student, who quit science in disgrace, leaving the tenured professors blameless. In more than one way, this story is a tragic opera. on Wednesday the journal Science Translational Medicine reported, “Retraction of the Research Article “SARS-CoV-2 S2–targeted vaccination elicits broadly neutralizing antibodies.” (Hat tip toReact 19’s diligent team.)

This was not a minor study. Cited as authoritative in eighty-three other studies, it had twenty-one authors including PhD student Kevin W. Ng, his supervising professor, and over a dozen more from the prestigious Francis Crick Institute in London.

This makes the second paper to be retracted this year with Kevin’s name attached; now a third is under review (published in Nature). Only Kevin went under the bus; and having gone down there, he is accumulating scandals faster than a teenager finding something to do on chore night.

💉 I am quite sure you well remember the smug arrogance with which the pandemic’s white-coated fraudsters assured all of us ignorant rubes that the jabs were completely safe and effective because of all the gold-standard studies, which they inartfully referred to as a homogeneous blob —with much waving of hands— collectively called “the science.” And The Science, in its turn, had an insectile face— that of human cockroach Anthony J. Fauci.

Here’s what all those experts always knew but never told us: studies that sound great at first often explode in disgrace. Not just crackpot studies from fringe epidemiologists, but peer-reviewed, top-tier, pharma-funded, 21-author, 83-times-cited studies from one of the most prestigious labs in Europe. This one stood for four years with fake data, and not one of Kevin Ng’s twenty co-authors noticed. Neither did the peer reviewers, the journal editors, or the 83 other scientists who cited it in their own papers, a magnificent masterwork of fraud spanning the globe.

There’s no such thing as a ‘gold standard’ study. Studies aren’t made of gold. Studies are called papers. And some papers turn out to be worthless checks.

What the experts definitely did not tell us was that inevitably, some of the pandemic’s rushed covid studies would later be quietly fed into the academic wood chipper —four years too late to save anyone— like this Crick Institute vaccine study. The Institute itself found, and I really do quote this time, “fabricated data are present … falsified images are present:”

[snip]

 I hope you’re sitting down. Retraction Watch’s ever-expanding list now exceeds 700 retracted Covid papers. Seven hundred! It’s become so commonplace that one more fraudulent covid study doesn’t make any news anymore, not even the science mags. It just is. It’s apparently an unremarkable fact of life, a force of nature, like how my city’s councilmembers can’t stop aggressive panhandlers occupying intersections, or for that matter, complete a grammatically correct sentence.

To the extent there is any, the scrap of good news is that 700 retracted covid papers shows the system is working. Granted, it is working slowly. And it is working too late to be any good to people who were forced to decide on short notice during the pandemic whether to take the shots or find a new job. But at least science is policing itself.

[snip]

So let’s see how well the academy policed itself in this case.

First, the rules. The rules require all named authors to meaningfully participate in the research, drafting, and supervision of any study bearing their name. Individual journals add their own rules; in the case of this study, each author was required to keep a copy of the data (they didn’t). There are even more rules for co-authors, and at the end of the day, leave little room for wriggling out of joint responsibility for papers you put your name on.

On paper, the ethical rules look just like you would hope. So you might fairly be wondering how Kevin Ng’s 20 co-authors slimed their way out of this meltdown.

💉 Personal accountability is always tricky. Humans make rules for others; humans want grace for themselves when things go sideways; so humans tweak the rules. So as ever, even though a massive superstructure of ethical rules hangs over publishing academics, there’s an escape hatch. A loophole. The fine print.

It turns out that, when a credible claim of academic fraud arises, journals assign the investigation to the sponsoring institution. On this covid vaccine paper, nineteen of twenty-one authors were with the Francis Crick Institute. So Crick investigated. Unsurprisingly, it found 20 of its senior academics to be completely innocent.

I am confident you are relieved to know they had nothing to do with it, and couldn’t possibly have prevented this from happening.

Retraction Watch said hey … wait a sec. How could it be, with all the ethical rules attached to co-authorship, that no one else shared any responsibility? That seems weird. It requested a copy of Crick’s investigative report. The Institute responded promptly and in full, by not responding at all.

The short, carefully scripted, one-paragraph article that began this section is all it has to say. Otherwise, you can talk to its lawyers.

Childers always follows things one step further.  For someone who is a successful lawyer, he is incidentally an awfully good investigative journalist in a fashion rarely seen these days.  And what he finds is often fascinating.  In this instance, improbable outcomes.

In the post-credit scene, after taking one for his team, Kevin quietly disassociated from the Crick Institute and Rockefeller University, surrendered forever his dream of becoming a famous bioscientist, and fell right into a whole new career. You won’t believe how he’s earning his living these days.

Ready for this? Kevin W. Ng is now a freelance music reporter for the New York Times. I promise I am not making that up.

That’s not even the strangest coincidence. Behold how Retraction Watch’s October 14th article described it: “Ng has pivoted away from science and now covers classical music, according to his website, an archived version of which lists his research and affiliations with Rockefeller and the Crick. Ng wrote an article on Giacomo Puccini’s opera ‘Turandot’ for The New York Times earlier this year.”

Um. Turandot is the opera featuring the aria ‘Nessun Dorma’ (literally, ‘none shall sleep’), which plays over the dramatic finale in the 2002 movie The Sum of All Fears. In the scene, framed by stirring opera music, the ‘white hats’ take out the bad guys worldwide all at once. Q’s Anons have linked that to the Trump Administration, and the President has leaned into it, playing the piece at rallies and the GOP nominating convention.

That’s the opera Kevin W. Ng, covid fraudster, patsy for the Francis Crick Institute, reviewed for the New York Times in his new music journalism job. I keep telling you that we can’t make this stuff up. So now you see why it is fair to call this story operatic.

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Fidelity, 1869 by Briton Rivière

Fidelity, 1869 by Briton Rivière (England, 1840-1920)


















Click to enlarge.

Thursday, October 15, 2026

Authoritarian regimes and execution as coercion

From Plunder: The Cataclysmic End to World War II in Europe by by Max Hastings.  

In World War I, 150 German soldiers were sentenced to death for serious crimes, of which a mere forty-eight were executed.  In World War II, thirty thousand death sentences were decreed by military courts, of which two-thirds were carried out, in addition to many more that took place without any judicial proceeding.  By contrast the British executed forty men, the French 103, the Americans 146, almost all the condemned Allied soldiers having committed capital crimes as defined in civil law, rather than being sentenced for dereliction of military duty.  Meanwhile the Japanese executed 22,253 of their own men, and the Russians at least 150,000, possibly as many as 300,000.

I am currently reading The Greatest Battle: Stalin, Hitler, and the Desperate Struggle for Moscow that Changed the Course of World War II by Andrew Nagorski.  He notes that the official figure of 158,000 executions is almost certainly an undercount.  These were the executions which were adjudicated and documented.  During the desperate days in the fall and winter of 1941, as the Germans approached Moscow, and as the leadership of the Soviet Union teetered on dissolution, Soviet battlefield defeats were so extensive and retreats so prevalent that executions that many executions occurred without process or documentation or even recollection.  

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Through a Cottage window, Shipley, Sussex, ca.1930-1940 by Charles Ginner

Through a Cottage window, Shipley, Sussex, ca.1930-1940 by Charles Ginner (Britain, 1878-1952) 
































Click to enlarge.

Wednesday, October 14, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Tenderness, 2026 by Marney Ward

Tenderness, 2026 by Marney Ward (Canada) 

















Click to enlarge.

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Full Moon Beach Point, 2022 by John Dowd

Full Moon Beach Point, 2022 by John Dowd (America, 1960 - )

























Click to enlarge.

Monday, October 12, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Coastal Scene by Pierre de Clausade

Coastal Scene by Pierre de Clausade (France, 1910–1976)





















Click to enlarge.

Sunday, October 11, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Nasturtiums, 1894 by Jan Voerman, Sr.

Nasturtiums, 1894 by Jan Voerman, Sr. (Netherlands, 1857–1941)
















Click to enlarge.

Saturday, October 10, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Data Talks

 

Rainy Day at Kongens Nytorv, c. 1925 by Paul Gustav Fischer

Rainy Day at Kongens Nytorv, c. 1925 by Paul Gustav Fischer (Denmark, 1860-1934)



















Click to enlarge.

Friday, October 9, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Philosophy, 2022 by Hiroki Kawanabe

Philosophy, 2022 by Hiroki Kawanabe (Japan, 1983 - )






























Click to enlarge.

Thursday, October 8, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

Data Talks

 

Marie in the Garden, 1895 by Peder Severin Kroyer

Marie in the Garden, 1895 by Peder Severin Kroyer (Denmark, 1851-1909)





























Click to enlarge.

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Tuesday, October 6, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Bahama Breeze by Peter Vey

Bahama Breeze by Peter Vey (America, 1957 - )
























Click to enlarge.

Monday, October 5, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Portnahaven, Islay by Pam Carter

Portnahaven, Islay by Pam Carter (Scotland, 1952 - )

























Click to enlarge.

Sunday, October 4, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

A Blue Evening in a Quiet Room by Neon Mary

A Blue Evening in a Quiet Room by Neon Mary (Germany, 1990 - )

























Click to enlarge.

Early Morning, 2006 by Bruce Cohen

Early Morning, 2006 by Bruce Cohen (America, 1953 - )






























Click to enlarge.

Saturday, October 3, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

On the Alster in Hamburg, 1910 by Max Lieberman

On the Alster in Hamburg, 1910 by Max Lieberman (Germany, 1847-1935) 





















Click to enlarge.

Friday, October 2, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Data Talks

 

Summer Day by Arnold Böcklin

Summer Day by Arnold Böcklin (Switzerland, 1827-1901)






























Click to enlarge.

Thursday, October 1, 2026

History

 

An Insight

 

I see wonderful things

 

Offbeat Humor

 

Data Talks

 

Where Day Meets Night by Michiel Schrijver

Where Day Meets Night by Michiel Schrijver (Netherlands, 1957 - )

























Click to enlarge.