Monday, June 13, 2022

Facts and emotional friends.

An old friend from overseas posted his outrage and anger about the Uvalde massacre.  His criticism focused on US gun policy as if gun control were an obvious and simple solution.

In thinking about how one might make an argument to friends from overseas who have little or no knowledge of America, American history, American culture, and American heterogeneity, I contemplated various elements of his implied likely argument.  One argument would be that K-12 school killings are a uniquely American phenomenon.  

This is of course not true, but I wanted to check the facts.  You have to of course pin down some precise definitions.  

For example, I think there is an implied "these shootings don't happen in other developed countries."  So I restrict it to OECD countries even though the most number of largest school shootings are in the developing world.

Next, what is the time frame?  Multi-victim K-12 school shootings were rare in the US before the late 1980s.  The Heller decision affirming the civil right of gun ownership (and making gun ownership less onerous) occurred in 2008.  I have used 1990-2022 as the time frame.
 
Do we include terrorist or para-military events?  This primarily relates to Russia.  I have included them.  

With these definitions, what are the top ten K-12 massacres since 1990?

Belsian School Siege, 2004, Russia, 333 killed.  Islamic Chechen terrorists.  Surprise attack.

Sandy Hook 2012, USA, 27 killed.  History of mental illness.  Known individual.

Robb Elementary 2022, USA, 21 killed.  History of mental Illness.  Known individual.

Stoneman Douglas High 2018, USA, 17 killed.  History of mental Illness.  Known individual.

Dunblane Massacre 1996, UK, 17 killed.  Criminal record.  Known Individual.

Erfurt School Massacre 2002, Germany, 16 killed.  School expulsion.  Surprise attack.

Winnenden School Shooting 2009, Germany, 15 killed.  History of mental illness.  Surprise attack.

Columbine High School Massacre 1999, USA, 13 killed.  Criminal records.  Known individuals.  

Santa Fe High School Shooting 2018, USA, 10 killed.  History of mental illness.  Surprise attack.

Kazan School Shooting 2021, Russia, 9 killed.  History of mental illness. Surprise attack.  

The US is certainly overrepresented with five of the ten K-12 mass killing events from 1990 - 2022.  However, to normalize this a bit based on population (larger countries will necessarily have more events even if they have the same incident rate), The US across this period had a population of about 300 million.  Germany, Russia, and Britain together had about 280 million.  

It appears, very roughly, that the US has the same incident rate of K-12 mass shootings as other OECD countries 1990-2022.

All three countries (Germany, Britain, Russia) have much stricter gun control than in the US where gun ownership is a Constitutional right only limited under very strict conditions.  Russia is perhaps the most permissive of the three.  Germany and Britain have among the most strict gun control laws in the world.

The US has perhaps 400 million privately owned guns in circulation.  Germany has about 6 million privately owned guns.  Britain has about 2 million privately owned guns.  Russia has about 18 million privately owned guns. 

If we divide the OECD where school massacres have occurred into two blocs, the US and Germany/Britain/Russia, then we have the US bloc with 400 million privately owned guns and the Germany/Britain/Russia bloc with 26 million privately owned guns.  

Top ten is an arbitrary cut-off.  It would be better at 100 or 1,000.  

The point is, though, that even at a crude level (top ten) if there is a strong correlation between school massacres and gun control or gun prevalence, we ought to see that signal.  We don't.

Maybe it is there.  But it isn't obvious.  And if it isn't obvious, then we need to know more.  Simplistic thinking is always dangerous, especially when fueled by anger.

Just as a marker, when reading the details of each account, it is clear that there are a couple of things going on unrelated to gun control or gun prevalence.  

In six of the events, the perpetrator had pre-existing mental illnesses recognized and documented before the killings.  

Five of the events were perpetrated by individuals already known to authorities either because of severe mental illness issues and/or criminal activities.  

If you combine both pre-existing mental health conditions with pre-existing criminal records (eight of the ten), it implies that had there been a more sensitive and robust health and legal tracking system, more of the perpetrators might have been diagnosed and/or treated in a fashion that might have prevented the killings.  

Seeking to understand what is happening does no disrespect for the tragedies that are involved.  In fact, if we truly wish to prevent these events from happening in the future, we do need to understand why they occur when they do.

Reflexive policies which are not well grounded in evidence in fact make a mockery of the tragedies because they are profound signals of un-seriousness.  

Is the US an outlier in these terrible tragedies?  It is not clear that it is.  

2 comments:

  1. While I agree in general that formulating effective policy responses to this fiercely complex issue demands a clear view of the facts I dispute both your definition of the subject and your selection of the parameters of the field. Regarding the subject: surely when we're bandying opinion about The American Disease we're referring to mass shootings (not just those in schools) that are carried out by people who own their weapons legally and while (usually) mentally ill are neither career criminals nor politically-motivated, professional terrorists. This is the phenomenon we're looking to understand. So Beslan - to take the most vivid exception - does not meet the definition. It was a hostage-related stunt carried out by a separatist militia in the much wider context of a war over a contested state. The operation was designed to build a media stage for a confrontation with Russian Special Forces that involved large numbers of combatants using automatic weapons, APC-mounted cannon, land-mines, RPGs, and heavy machine guns. Sure the battle took place in the grounds of a school but there's no way it was a 'school shooting' or even a 'mass shooting' in the sense I sketch above. As for the field: we shouldn't be looking to narrow the set to a small and unrepresentative list using the high score model. Rather we should include all the mass shootings in the time period and then compare nation states by the total number of incidents, after that we could nuance it by adding per n population or per guns owned and so on. I'm British (btw) and from memory I think there have been only two or three school shootings in the last hundred years and not many more mass shootings. I'm not saying that means anything in particular, I'm just saying that in a country of around 60 million people gun- related massacres are very unusual. Cheers, Joel (love the blog).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joel, glad you enjoy the blog. I agree, if we use different definitions we will get different results and different interpretations.

    I will do an additional post to elaborate. My purpose in this one was simply to illustrate that whichever definitions we use, the results often do no match the stereotypes.

    In addition, I am interested in the challenge of how to engage in meaningful dialogue when people from different nations, histories, and cultural orientations are working from different fact bases.

    I'll elaborate sometime today.

    ReplyDelete