Friday, January 18, 2019

Folklore and adages as a knowledge/wisdom transmittal mechanism of mental models and heuristics which in turn prime productivity.

From Folklore by Stelios Michalopoulos and Melanie Meng Xue. From the Abstract:
Folklore is the collection of traditional beliefs, customs, and stories of a community, passed through the generations by word of mouth. This vast expressive body, studied by the corresponding discipline of folklore, has evaded the attention of economists. In this study we do four things that reveal the tremendous potential of this corpus for understanding comparative development and culture. First, we introduce and describe a unique catalogue of folklore that codes the presence of thousands of motifs for roughly 1,000 pre-industrial societies. Second, we use a dictionary-based approach to elicit group-specific measures of various traits related to the natural environment, institutional framework, and mode of subsistence. We establish that these proxies are in accordance with the ethnographic record, and illustrate how to use a group’s oral tradition to quantify non-extant characteristics of preindustrial societies. Third, we use folklore to uncover the historical cultural values of a group. Doing so allows us to test various influential conjectures among social scientists including the original affluent society, the culture of honor among pastoralists, the role of family in extended kinship systems and the intensity of trade and rule-following norms in politically centralized group. Finally, we explore how cultural norms inferred via text analysis of oral traditions predict contemporary attitudes and beliefs.
I have long been interested in the connection between folklore, folkways, aphorisms, proverbs, adages and societal progress and productivity. My supposition is that developed nations might be developed because there is a rich store of useful mental models and cultural coding sustained through folklore and adages.

Michalopoulos and Xue don't answer that question directly but they lay the groundwork for answering it. Here is a much earlier ungated version of their paper.

No comments:

Post a Comment