The ruins of Old Kandahar, Afghanistan. Known in antiquity as either Alexandria Arachosia or Alexandropolis, this was a flourishing settlement that saw Greek presence following Alexander the Great’s invasion. It might also be the city of Wuyishanli referred to in Chinese accounts pic.twitter.com/Jun32TqUj8
— Derek | The Hellenistic Age Podcast (@HellenisticPod) May 19, 2022
I think the left is really surprised by this disastrous turn of events. They thought the taxes, windmills, DIE agenda were really going to work and still think it would have too if not for -- bad luck.
— wretchardthecat (@wretchardthecat) May 20, 2022
If you touch the surface of a pool whose surface has floating impurities with some soap, you can obtain an impressive demonstration of the Marangoni effect, or how a gradient in surface tension is created [read more: https://t.co/1aBwvS2rgX] pic.twitter.com/y70QRtJZ3G
— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) May 19, 2022
The tremendous expansion & the differentiation of the neocortex constitute two major events in the evolution of the mammalian brain. The increase in size & complexity of our brains opened the way to a spectacular development of cognitive and mental skills https://t.co/ElKdZopo5C pic.twitter.com/I2wQcGdn7x
— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) May 20, 2022
Man's most valuable traitis a judicious sense of what not to believe.
I cannot praise a fugitive and cloistered virtue, unexercised and unbreathed, that never sallies out and sees her adversary, but slinks out of the race where that immortal garland is to be run for, not without dust and heat.
Tomb of Seti I is one of longest, deepest and most elaborately painted tombs in Valley of the Kings.
— ArchaeoHistories (@histories_arch) May 19, 2022
Seti I was second king of 19th Dynasty, and father of Ramesses II. His tomb is sometimes nicknamed "Belzoni's tomb" after its discoverer.#archaeohistories pic.twitter.com/NYOzYVBRvt
These were issues that were not just obvious in retrospect but at the time. A simple test for who knows what they're talking about.
Good ideas sell themselves. When govt mandates what you otherwise wouldn't do, there's probably something wrong with it. Nobody has to make people line up for fried chicken.
— wretchardthecat (@wretchardthecat) May 20, 2022
The impact of the racial reckoning in the nonprofit sector is being keenly felt in the nation’s capital, which has the third-largest concentration of locally focused nonprofits in the United States. When national organizations are taken into account, the Washington region is home to about 50,000 nonprofits employing 600,000 people, or, to put it another way, about one in four workers in Washington is a nonprofit employee, according to a 2018 report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Haid al-Jazil is a 500-year-old mud-brick village on top of a massive boulder. Wadi Dawan, Yemen. pic.twitter.com/QMKFit0Amc
— History Defined (@historydefined) May 19, 2022
man with cat hood reading with cat, france, 15th century pic.twitter.com/zDPng0Y0Dz
— weird medieval guys (@WeirdMedieval) May 20, 2022
(2) As w police violence, it's striking how tiny these #s are - neo-Nazis, Muslim rads, and Black Blockers combined kill FORTY people per year? That's a threat on par w "honeybees."
— Wilfred Reilly (@wil_da_beast630) May 19, 2022
It really would be nice to see the media focus on real threats, as vs ginning up stupid panics.
This last week, the CDC held their ACIP meeting to discuss whether or not they should recommend the COVID vaccines for children 6 months to 5 years old. While presenting on the danger of the virus for children, a slide was shown claiming that COVID presented as one of the leading causes of death for children.
Click to enlarge.
Kelley, who runs covid-georgia.com, saw this slide and immediately knew it was false. She has been tracking COVID data in excruciating detail in Georgia since the beginning of the pandemic and has recently become an expert on the CDC’s pediatric death data simply because it was such a disaster and she wanted to get down to the truth of the matter.This slide above is no small error. Not only did it count the wrong number for pediatric COVID deaths, it compared all pediatric COVID deaths in a 26-month period to annualized deaths from other causes. This is a massive data error, and yet it persisted through a supposedly rigorous data check from 11 authors and was selected by top-tier scientists for their landmark presentation to the most knowledgeable experts in the field.No one in any of these meetings recognized this error. This slide was presented uncritically to the nation’s top doctors and epidemiologists who are in charge of setting the national policy on COVID vaccines for children and no one even noticed it. It was spread uncritically by dozens more experts, including a former Surgeon General of the United States.And this error was caught by a woman who tweets using just her first name only and runs fact-checker on the world’s most eminent scientists in her free time.On the one hand, I’m delighted that what Kelley does makes an impact. It looks like her persistence will result in a re-evaluation of the paper from which this chart was taken. In that way, the system works. But the system utterly failed before it worked and it’s only working now because an internet rando is more knowledgeable and paying closer attention than our top scientists and doctors.
In the last two years, we’ve watched this story play out with alarming frequency. High-profile experts who are running policy for the nation (or even the world) show themselves to be woefully uninformed in their field of expertise. Over the last two years, a huge portion of this very newsletter has been about looking at nationwide narratives concerning COVID data and asking if they are actually true.I’ve started asking myself: Why are we continuously playing whack-a-mole with bad policy drawn from poor science? It is impossible to do this forever, and for many people, it’s impossible to do this at all. Most people don’t know where to go to get the data and they wouldn’t know what to do with it if they got it.This is the core of the authority crisis. After so many devastating and public failures at the highest levels of expertise, it seems untenable to give them credence simply based on their credentials and institutional positions.
“Humans are foolish and dumb because we mourn
— sententiae antiquae (@sentantiq) May 19, 2022
The dead but not the wilting flower of youth.
Take some pleasure, my dear heart. For all too soon
there will be other people here. And, dead, I will be dark earth.” #Theognis
This is why compulsory, comprehensive global programs to transform the world are dangerous. One can learn from limited failure but imagine if the whole planet went organic all at once ...https://t.co/vZx7zHZ8G5
— wretchardthecat (@wretchardthecat) May 20, 2022
My library at night creates her own unexplored mythology as each closed book is a path untrodden.
— Michel Lara (@VeraCausa9) May 19, 2022
The oneiric silence summons me to open any book, a serendipitous calling to ease worldly cares.
A kingdom of memories awaits, ever sieged by oblivion and its forces of the unread. pic.twitter.com/H8Mw4V6RGh
The country threw itself a "racial reckoning," and all black America got was a 34% surge in murders.
— Free Black Thought (@FreeBlckThought) May 20, 2022
Tragic, tragic figures here ⬇️https://t.co/ZmNON0mL6F pic.twitter.com/pbxS3Suol3
They count every white male who shoots people as "right-wing" in this study, even if they specifically called themselves socialists
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) May 19, 2022
They also include domestic violence as "right wing extremism" https://t.co/gOf9KNwBlJ
I do not want to compare Friedman’s views to what Noah Smith or someone else would say now. I want to compare them to what economists believed then, meaning 1967, prior to Friedman’s address to the American Economic Association.Back then, monetarism had about the same status as astrology. Robert Solow could quip, “Everything reminds Milton of the money supply. Everything reminds me of sex, but at least I keep it out of my papers.”
Wood is between the most common resources used in prehistory, but only rarely preserved. Handle for an adze from Langeneichstädt, 3100-3650 BCE; part of a handle for an axe, Magdeburg, 4100-3700 BCE. Photos © LDA Saxony-Anhalt, J. Lipták. pic.twitter.com/buIK1vb8Fh
— State Museum of Prehistory Halle (Saale) (@MuseumHalle_E) May 18, 2022
The Disinformation Governance Board is disbanded. Netflix has told employees they will have to tolerate content they don’t agree with. Dave Chappelle and Joe Rogan are still standing, more popular than ever.
— Jack Hunter (@jackhunter74) May 18, 2022
The tide is turning. Stand up for free speech. Stand up for liberalism.
This miniature ecosystem has been thriving in an almost completely isolated state since 1960. It has been watered just once in that time. pic.twitter.com/YF2t1IZDDb
— History Defined (@historydefined) May 19, 2022
the hardest diss in the game was published circa 1744 and has yet to be topped pic.twitter.com/rOtyqX3rhm
— non-haunted gem (regular ) (@Choplogik) May 19, 2022
There are roughly 100 million lakes larger than one hectare to be found globally. The largest lakes, which rival the size of entire nations, are more of a rarity. This infographic by https://t.co/Ube1thv1cx shows the world’s 25 largest lakes, side by side: https://t.co/tXfoawLTRe pic.twitter.com/GYAmXPZ6Za
— Massimo (@Rainmaker1973) May 19, 2022
The Walk to Paradise Garden . . . the children in the photograph are my children, and on the day I made this photographic effort, I was not sure I would be capable of ever photographing again.There had been the war – now it seems like a long time ago, that war called World, volume II – and during my 13th Pacific invasion shell fragments ended my photographic coverage of it. Too painful, helpless years followed my multiple wounding, during which time I had to stifle my restless spirit into a state of impassive, non-creative suspension, while the doctors by their many operations slowly tried to repair me. . . . But now, this day, I would endeavor to refute two years of negation. On this day, for the first time since my injuries, I would try again to make the camera work for me, would try to force my body to control the mechanics of the camera; and, as well, I would try to command my creative spirit out of its exile.Urgently, something compelled that this photograph must not be a failure – pray God that I could do so much as physically force a roll of film into the camera! I was determined that this first photograph must sing of more than being a technical accomplishment. Determined that it would speak of a gentle moment of a spirited purity in contrast to the deprave savagery I had raged against with my war photographs – my last photographs. I was almost desperate in this determination, in my insistence that for some reason his first exposure must have a special quality. I've never quite understood why it had to be thus, why it had to be the first and not the second; why, if not accomplish today, it could not be accomplished next week; yet that day I challenged myself to do it, against my nerves, against my reason. . . .Whatever the reason – probably more complex than one – I felt, without labeling it as such, that it was to be a day of spiritual decision. . . .Still, and regardless of the conflict that raged within me, there was no change in my determination, and of my intentions for that first photograph. These woods with these children prancing through them in happiness . . .. . . as against war photographs I had made of a terrified mother and her child wheeling in bewilderment behind a shell-broken tree . . .
Today, however, regulatory capture persists. The revolving door between Wall Street and financial regulatory agencies remains an ever-present problem. Presidents Joe Biden and Donald Trump both used executive fiats to raise or maintain import tariffs on items like solar panels and goods from China. The Jones Act, in place since 1920, continues to protect American shipping interests. Ethanol subsidies support the American corn industry but hurt the poor in developing countries. Even as the internet has started to democratize the public-comment process — which is the primary way the public can engage with proposed rules — it remains dominated by special-interest groups. As debates have grown ever more technical and arcane, the average man on the street has little chance of influencing regulatory policy.Regulatory capture may be even worse at the state level. One 2017 study found that 85% of state occupational-licensing boards are required by law to consist of a majority of licensed professionals from the industry being regulated. Not surprisingly, these boards end up protecting incumbents and making it harder for would-be competitors — often blue-collar workers trying to get a leg up — to enter a profession. Regulatory capture has also morphed into new forms. Take "NIMBYism": When property owners lobby their local governments to establish zoning rules, historical-preservation laws, minimum lot-size requirements, parking restrictions, and similar regulations that limit building and development, they drive up property values. Just as with other forms of regulatory capture, these types of economic regulations restrict entry into the market so that a particular resource under special-interest control becomes increasingly scarce.[snip]
Yandle's and Stigler's theories can be read as complementary to one another. Yandle's insight is, in some ways, an astute observation of something that should have been obvious: that regulations need coalitions of support behind them in order to become law. His theory offers a plausible explanation of how coalitions form to influence regulators, but it doesn't address the fact that the overall level of regulation in certain industries seems to rise unrelentingly year after year. This is where Stigler's capture theory is helpful. Firms typically resist new regulation attempts in order to avoid the corresponding compliance costs. However, once regulations are implemented, compliance costs are often sunk and cannot be recouped. Therefore, existing firms will often resist efforts to remove the very rules they initially fought against, since these regulations become barriers that stand between them and potential competitors who haven't yet paid the compliance costs. These dynamics all but ensure that there is no influential constituency to support removing regulations once they are enacted.Yet Yandle's theory is better than Stigler's at explaining why the dominant form of regulation over the last 40 years has been social regulation. Capture theory would predict the opposite: that economic regulation would be dominant, as seemed to be the case in the 1970s. Experience since then, however, has shown that shamelessly self-interested economic regulation lacks a public-interest rationale, and therefore often fails to convince regulators and a skeptical public to favor the policy. Social regulations provide business interests with a useful public-interest cover.[snip]
One example of such evidence-free regulation in recent years comes from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). In 2021, HHS repealed a rule enacted by the Trump administration that would have required the agency to periodically review its regulations for their impact on small businesses. The measure was known as the SUNSET rule because it would attach sunset provisions, or expiration dates, to department rules. If the agency failed to conduct a review, the regulation expired.Ironically, in proposing to rescind the SUNSET rule, HHS argued that it would be too time consuming and burdensome for the agency to review all of its regulations. Citing almost no academic work in support of its proposed repeal — a reflection of the anti-consequentialism that animates so much contemporary regulatory policy — the agency effectively asserted that assessing the real-world consequences of its existing rules was far less pressing an issue than addressing the perceived problems of the day (by, of course, issuing more regulations).Through its actions, HHS has rejected the very notion of having to review its own rules and assess whether they work. In fact, the suggestion that agencies review their regulations is an almost inexplicably divisive issue in Washington today. "Retrospective review" has become a dirty term, while cost-benefit analysis has morphed into a tool to judge intentions rather than predict real-world consequences. The shift highlights how far the modern administrative state has drifted from the rational, evidence-based system envisioned by the law-and-economics movement just a few decades ago.In today's administrative state, intellectual fads appear to be in the driver's seat, while science and economics are simply along for the ride. Despite pronouncements to the contrary, few intellectuals seem genuinely interested in "following the science": Too many have their careers, social status, and sense of personal identity wrapped up in perpetuating the status quo.
The so-called "Peace of the Ladies".
— Aristocratic Fury (@LandsknechtPike) May 18, 2022
But it would not last long.
In 1536 new hostilities started. https://t.co/96guJ3KhW5
Without the benefit of paralinguistic cues such as gesture, emphasis, and intonation, it can be difficult to convey emotion and tone over electronic mail (e-mail). Five experiments suggest that this limitation is often underappreciated, such that people tend to believe that they can communicate over e-mail more effectively than they actually can. Studies 4 and 5 further suggest that this overconfidence is born of egocentrism, the inherent difficulty of detaching oneself from one's own perspective when evaluating the perspective of someone else. Because e-mail communicators "hear" a statement differently depending on whether they intend to be, say, sarcastic or funny, it can be difficult to appreciate that their electronic audience may not.
Social judgment is inherently egocentric. When people try to imagine the perspective, thoughts, or feelings of someone else, a growing body of evidence suggests that they use themselves as an anchor or reference point. Although precisely why this occurs—whether the result of an overlearned and generally valid heuristic, the residual byproduct of an earlier stage of childhood egocentrism, or the inevitable consequence of an effortful cognitive process such as anchoring and adjustment—is a matter of some debate, the fact remains that the assessment of another’s perspectives is influenced, at least in part, by one’s own (Camerer,Loewenstein, & Weber, 1989; Epley, Keysar, Van Boven, &Gilovich, 2004; Fischhoff, 1975; Flavell, 1977; Fussell & Krauss,1991; Gilovich, Medvec, & Savitsky, 2000; Gilovich, Savitsky, & Medvec, 1998; Hoch, 1987; Inhelder & Piaget, 1958; Kelley &Jacoby, 1996; Keysar, Barr, & Horton, 1998; Keysar & Bly, 1995;Nickerson, 1999, 2001; Ross & Ward, 1996).Nowhere is this tendency more apparent than in the music tapping study conducted by Elizabeth Newton (1990). Participants in her study were asked to tap the rhythm of a well-known song toa listener and then assess the likelihood that the listener would correctly identify the song. The results were striking: Tappers estimated that approximately 50% of listeners would correctly identify the song, compared with an actual accuracy rate of 3%.What accounts for this dramatic overestimation? The answer becomes immediately apparent when one contrasts the perspectives of tappers and listeners, as Ross and Ward (1996) invited their readers to do when describing Newton’s results. Whereas tappers could inevitably “hear” the tune and even the words to the song (perhaps even a “full orchestration, complete with rich har-monies between string, winds, brass, and human voice”), the listeners were limited to “an aperiodic series of taps” (Ross &Ward (1996, p. 114). Indeed, it was difficult from the listener’s perspective to even tell “whether the brief, irregular moments of silence between taps should be construed as sustained notes, as musical “rests” between notes, or as mere interruptions as the tapper contemplates the “music” to come next” (p. 114). So rich was the phenomenology of the tappers, however, that it was difficult for them to set it aside when assessing the objective stimuli available to listeners. As a result, tappers assumed that what was obvious to them (the identity of the song) would be obvious to their audience.
"It's absolutely abhorrent that the right would push race-driven narratives of political replacement!" pic.twitter.com/pCL0sxcn2r
— Theo Jordan (@Theo_TJ_Jordan) May 19, 2022
Price's square root law or Price's law pertains to the relationship between the literature on a subject and the number of authors in the subject area, stating that half of the publications come from the square root of all contributors. Thus, if 100 papers are written by 25 authors, five authors will have contributed 50 papers. Price's law is related to Lotka's law and has been likened to the Matthew Principle. It can be modeled using an approximately L-shaped graph, with number of people on the Y-axis, and productivity or resources on the X-axis.
Research has shown that unmarried women feel more connected than their married counterparts to other women—a phenomenon known as “linked fate”— and it can lead them to support more liberal policies. In their fascinating 2017 study, Christopher T. Stout, Kelsy Kretschmer, and Leah Ruppanner argue that “women consistently earn less money and hold less power, which fosters women’s economic dependency on men. Thus, it is within married women’s interests to support policies and politicians who protect their husbands and improve their status.” This phenomenon of “linked fate” was not found to be evident among men, so even though young men are also less likely to be married compared to older generations, their marital status may have less of an impact on their politics than for women.[snip]Overall, young people today are far more likely to identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender or queer than at any previous time—according to Gallup, approximately one in six members of Gen Z identify as LGBT. But it’s young women who are most responsible for the rapid growth of LGBTQ identity. And while it would not be surprising that the politics of LGBT Americans are more liberal when it comes to LGBTQ issues, recent work has shown that “LGBT Americans are distinctively liberal … in their general political predispositions, electoral choices, and attitudes on a wide range of policy matters.”
For now, it appears young women are poised to become a powerful political force, one that will shape the fortunes of both political parties for years to come.
The gorgeous hillfort of Castro Ventosa (Cacabelos, Bierzo) is an outstanding example of a Late Antiquity Gallaecian fortified settlement. With an blurred initial phase in the Early Iron Age, its biggest development was in the 5th century AD. 👇#HillfortsWednesday pic.twitter.com/rWeL1eQOnH
— Manuel Gago (@magago) May 18, 2022
I feel obligated to have a garage sale, just so I can make this sign. pic.twitter.com/17YVMbwL9j
— Smatt (@mdrache) May 19, 2022
“Over the last decade, origination for mortgage loans between $10,000 and $70,000 and between $70,000 and $150,000 has dropped by 38 percent and 26 percent, respectively, while origination for loans exceeding $150,000 rose by a staggering 65 percent,” reports a new study on small-dollar mortgages from the Center for the Study of Economic Mobility at Winston-Salem State University and the Future of Land and Housing program at the New America think tank. The study is scheduled for release on TuesdayThe culprits behind the disappearance of small-dollar mortgages are lending restrictions enacted with good intentions and warped by economic blind spots. Designed to protect borrowers and the financial system, the Dodd-Frank Act regulations passed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis “increased the fixed costs and the per-loan costs of extending a mortgage,” says the study. The regulation-imposed costs made small-dollar mortgages a lousy proposition for lenders.Compounding the problem, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau then limited the fees that lenders could charge as closing costs. For profit-oriented lenders, small-dollar mortgages are no longer worth the trouble. At best, they squeeze out the tiniest of margins. At worst, they don’t even cover the fixed cost of processing the loan.
Killing off the small-dollar mortgage market has been an economic catastrophe in East Winston and other lower-income, often historically Black and Latino, neighborhoods. Would-be homeowners can’t buy and longtime homeowners can’t sell. Despite population growth, the inflation-adjusted value of a house in East Winston has fallen from about $150,000 in 2007 to just under $64,000 today, using the Zillow Home Value index. (The nadir was $39,825 in 2014.)Massive amounts of hard-won local wealth have been wiped out. “We calculated that in real terms, every $1,000 invested in property in East Winston in 1996 is now worth $430; by comparison, every $1,000 invested elsewhere in the county is now worth $1,290,” says the study. The low-dollar houses that do sell mostly go to bargain-hunting investors paying cash rather than to would-be owner-occupants.Eager to rein in mortgage lenders, legislators behind Dodd-Frank didn’t grasp what the law might mean for borrowers who would otherwise qualify for modest loans. Neither did the regulators at the CFPB. Rare is the policy maker who can even imagine a single-family home today selling for five digits.
They were careless people, Tom and Daisy—they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.
Even the most thoughtful forecast from 15 years ago would not have imagined today's scenario (via @climate) https://t.co/6taoy9nIEm
— Bloomberg CityLab (@CityLab) May 19, 2022
The article constantly equivocates between “the problem is that polyamory is too white” and “the problem is that the media portrays polyamory as too white”, which is kind of a weird combination of problems to be discussing in a media portrayal. But it seems to eventually settle on a thesis that black people really are strongly underrepresented.
For the record, here is a small sample of other communities where black people are strongly underrepresented:Runners (3%). Bikers (6%). Furries (2%). Wall Street senior management (2%). Occupy Wall Street protesters (unknown but low, one source says 1.6% but likely an underestimate). BDSM (unknown but low) Tea Party members (1%). American Buddhists (~2%). Bird watchers (4%). Environmentalists (various but universally low). Wikipedia contributors (unknown but low). Atheists (2%). Vegetarian activists (maybe 1-5%). Yoga enthusiasts (unknown but low). College baseball players (5%). Swimmers (2%). Fanfiction readers (2%). Unitarian Universalists (1%).Can you see what all of these groups have in common?No. No you can’t. If there’s some hidden factor uniting Wall Street senior management and furries, it is way beyond any of our pay grades.
Werewolves of LondonSong by Warren ZevonI saw werewolf with a Chinese menu in his handWalking through the streets of SoHo in the rainHe was looking for the place called Lee Ho FooksFor to get a big dish of beef chow meinAh-hoo, werewolves of LondonAh-hooAh-hoo, werewolves of LondonAh-hooYou hear him howling around your kitchen doorYou better not let him inLittle old lady got mutilated late last nightWerewolves of London againAh-hoo, werewolves of LondonAh-hooAh-hoo, werewolves of LondonAh-hoo, huhHe's the hairy handed gent who ran amok in KentLately he's been overheard in MayfairYou better stay away from him, he'll rip your lungs out JimHuh, I'd like to meet his tailorAh-hoo, werewolves of LondonAh-hooAh-hoo, werewolves of LondonAh-hooWell, I saw Lon Chaney walking with the QueenDoin' the werewolves of LondonI saw Lon Chaney Jr. walking with the Queen, uhDoin' the werewolves of LondonI saw a werewolf drinkin' a piña colada at Trader Vic'sHis hair was perfectAh-hoo, werewolves of LondonHey draw bloodAh-hoo, werewolves of London
Complex problems are ones like raising a child. Once you learn how to send a rocket to the moon, you can repeat the process with other rockets and perfect it. One rocket is like another rocket. But not so with raising a child, the professors point out. Every child is unique. Although raising one child may provide experience, it does not guarantee success with the next child. Expertise is valuable but most certainly not sufficient. Indeed, the next child may require an entirely different approach from the previous one. And this brings up another feature of complex problems: their outcomes remain highly uncertain. Yet we all know that it is possible to raise a child well. It’s complex, that’s all.
Just buy what you want, work for who pays you the most, and buy sin-filled stocks. Then, give all that extra money to charity.
The preparedness paradox is the proposition that if a society or individual acts effectively to mitigate a potential disaster such as a pandemic, natural disaster or other catastrophe so that it causes less harm, the avoided danger will be perceived as having been much less serious because of the limited damage actually caused. The paradox is the incorrect perception that there had been no need for careful preparation as there was little harm, although in reality the limitation of the harm was due to preparation. Several cognitive biases can consequently hamper proper preparation for future risks.
How to recognise an Anglo-Saxon church (pre-1066)
— The Cultural Tutor (@culturaltutor) May 17, 2022
All English churches are palimpsests modified by every generation.
But here's a few ways to tell if you're looking at something built by the Anglo-Saxons -> pic.twitter.com/XoEefJClHX
Showing much love and little wisdom.
My love for you was greater than my wisdom.
Posts
All Comments
