Science judges hypotheses, not by what they explain, but by what they fail to explain. When anomalies pile up, experts reject the hypothesis that engender them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Search This Blog
Posts
Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(429)
-
▼
August
(32)
- Your values become your destiny
- The game changes as you play it
- Not by what they explain, but by what they fail to...
- Tuchman's Law
- Ngrams and books
- Challenged books
- Technology or relevance
- We need efficient feedback and we need the capacit...
- What both common sense and expert consensus assure...
- Behaviors and well-being
- Evolution is more of a tinkerer and less of an eng...
- Logic, facts and context
- Engage
- Decision-making in an environment of constraints
- Cui bono one more time
- The result is a bloated imagination, sickly judgme...
- The name of the world's most famous poet reposes c...
- Well-meaning but without understanding
- Anything that he receives into his mind at that ag...
- Time discovers truth
- Everyone does not know everyone else
- We are currently not monitoring the situation
- Shakespeare made up more than 8.5 percent of his w...
- The world we perceive is the world we see through ...
- Narrative stories versus empirical stories
- Discussion Pyramid
- I like how you punctuate ignorance with certainty
- I swear he's like a lamp
- I'm shocked, shocked . . .
- I must conclude, however unlikely the conclusion s...
- Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not ful...
- The English language hasn't got where it is by bei...
-
▼
August
(32)
About Me
- Charles
- A family man, a management consultant, a book seller and an avid reader. Committed to helping children become avid readers in turn. The great chain of reading always needs renewing.
No comments:
Post a Comment