Massive status bias in peer review.
— Brian Nosek (@BrianNosek) September 9, 2022
534 reviewers randomized to review the same paper revealing the low status, high status, or neither author. 65% reject low status, 23% reject high status.
Amazing work by Juergen Huber and colleagues. #prc9 pic.twitter.com/xEY7Sx0CYt
Thursday, October 13, 2022
Data Talks
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment